{"id":186,"date":"2024-08-22T17:13:24","date_gmt":"2024-08-22T17:13:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wordswomenmyths.co.uk\/?p=186"},"modified":"2024-11-14T16:02:01","modified_gmt":"2024-11-14T16:02:01","slug":"poetry-and-prose-coursework-y10","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wordswomenmyths.co.uk\/?p=186","title":{"rendered":"Poetry and Prose Coursework (Y10)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Exploring how the writers of \u201cStill I Rise\u201d, \u201cThe Necklace\u201d, and \u201cThe Story of an Hour\u201d present the female perspective. <\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Feminist writers throughout the centuries have reminded us of the conventions and quintessential qualities that men have given us and have defied these stereotypes through poetry, novels, short stories and more. These pieces of literature have invited a patriarchal society to reflect on the prejudices faced by women and have inspired people to acknowledge the power and strength of women instead of marginalising them as weak and subservient.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n<p>In Maya Angelou\u2019s poem, \u201cStill I Rise\u201d, she presents herself to be determined in rising above the oppression and prejudices suffered by black women in the 1970\u2019s. Angelou states that people \u201cmay write [her] down in history\u201d and tell her story through a male perspective but throughout the poem she makes it clear that she remains relentless in giving their words any value. This is demonstrated through the use of the anaphora \u201cyou may\u201d, which connotes that Angelou is aware and acknowledging that the oppressor- or alternatively, society- has the power and leverage to \u201ccut\u2026 shoot\u2026 kill\u201d her. Despite the tricolon of these active and violent verbs she still insists that her truth and spirit will overcome whatever falsehoods this prejudiced society spreads. In fact, Angelou places a strong emphasis on this point by rhyming the \u201cbitter, twisted lies\u201d with \u201cbut still, like dust, I\u2019ll rise\u201d in the first stanza; she is able to directly counter the lies of her oppressor with her rise and this reiterates her power and resilience regardless of the hardship&#8217;s society will throw at her.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Throughout the poem, Angelou constantly makes references to her femininity (and the strength of this femininity) through symbols and imagery linked to sexuality. Angelou compares herself to be \u201cjust like moons and like suns\u201d and states that she is \u201ca black ocean\u2026 welling and swelling\u201d; both the metaphor and similes have typical connotations to feminism, with the moon representing the rhythm of time as it embodies our menstrual cycle and \u201cwelling and swelling\u201d implying pregnancy, but also the\u201cblack ocean\u201d reminding us of Angelou\u2019s heritage and moreover, reinforcing the immensity (just like the ocean) of her muliebrity and strength. In addition to this, Angelou directly addresses the oppressor\u2019s notions on femininity through the rhetorical questions \u201cDoes my sexiness upset you?\u201d and \u201cDoes it come as a surprise that I dance like I\u2019ve got diamonds at the meeting of my thighs?\u201d &#8211; Implying that the problem society has with her lies with her having a sense of value, pride, and worth in who she is; by associating the \u201cmeeting of [her] thighs\u201d with \u201cdiamonds\u201d she\u2019s placing the idea of wealth together with an intimate part of her and therefore is deepening her self-regard despite the distaste towards women being overtly confident in themselves and their sexuality. Angelou effectively manages to uplift the readers\u2019 spirit through a literary work that has enormous potency in inspiring other (black) women to understand their inner strength and consequently empower them to remain strong against any tribulation they face in times where racism and sexism were prevalent.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n<p>Kate Chopin\u2019s \u201cThe Story of An Hour\u201d reveals how a female&#8217;s true strength can be revealed when liberated from a controlled environment or person. The main character of this short story, Mrs Louise Mallard, is a reflection of the gender roles seen in the eighteenth century; women were considered to be inferior and subservient to their male counterparts and were expected to oversee the many domestic duties in their household environment instead of having the liberty to be independent and do as they please. This is seen with Chopin\u2019s initial presentation of Louise who conforms to a Victorian stereotype (\u201cafflicted with heart trouble\u201d &#8211; suggesting weakness and being \u201cyoung, with a fair, calm face\u201d reinforcing the expectations of a women\u2019s beauty), but soon after her husband&#8217;s death we see her defying the expectations of subservience and realising that \u201cthere was something coming to her (\u2026\u201dthrough the sounds, scents, and colours\u201d) and she was waiting for it, fearfully\u201d before realising, after \u201cabandon[ing] herself\u201d, that it was freedom. The personification of freedom through sensory language makes the freedom even more powerful and consuming for Mrs Mallard and the exclamatory tricolon of \u201cfree, free, free!\u201d that follows, shows the passion she has in accepting her widowhood because with it comes a newly born freedom that does not bind her to the conformations of a restraining marriage; this aberrant reaction reflects not only Louise\u2019s opinion on<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>defying the acceptance of a biased and inequitable marriage but perhaps also a&nbsp;<em>society<\/em>&nbsp;of women\u2019s opinions too. I believe Chopin tried to get an audience of women to understand that even though the ideas of a women\u2019s inferiority are embedded deeply into a community, it doesn\u2019t mean that these ideas are right and truthful and in fact, when removing oneself from these environments they can begin to truly comprehend their desires and realise they\u2019re normal and deserved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n<p>Similarly to \u201cThe story of an Hour\u201d, Guy de Maupassant\u2019s short story &#8211; \u201cThe Necklace\u201d- presents us with a stereotypical 18<sup>th<\/sup>&nbsp;century bourgeois woman. Mathilde Loisel, the main protagonist of this story, is described to be \u201cone of those pretty girls, delightful girls who, apparently by some error of Fate, get themselves born to the daughters of very civil servants\u201d; the first lines of this text already establish that a woman\u2019s importance was their beauty and social status or wealth.&nbsp; Mathilde \u201chas no dowry, no expectations, no means of meeting some rich, important man who would understand\u201d and therefore (like many other women at the time) has to rely on her \u201cbeauty, grace and charm\u201d for she has \u201cnor rank, nor class\u201d to set her place in a patriarchal\u2019s society hierarchy. This negative tricolon reveals a sense of hopelessness and impotence in her social position as she would\u2019ve been highly restricted in her options to marry given that she wasn\u2019t born of wealth. Furthermore, the triplet of \u201cbeauty, grace, and charm\u201d, exhibits that great importance is placed on a woman\u2019s surface attributions in order to do them \u201cservice for birthright and connections\u201d. So, unlike a man, who would\u2019ve been independent to rise up the hierarchy of social position, a woman is severely segregated in terms of social ladders given that she would be passive and dependant on the income of her husband to survive. I believe this is presented through Mathilde\u2019s materialistic perspective on the world around her; the grandiose imagery and enumeration in Mathilde\u2019s everyday desires of \u201csilent antechambers hung with oriental tapestries\u201d, \u201cgreat drawing rooms dressed with old silk\u201d, and \u201cpretty little parlours [\u2026] made for intimate talk [\u2026] with one\u2019s closest friends\u201d show how possessing lavish items is her foremost desire, as she cannot be considered noble or important in any other way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mathilde\u2019s hamartia is presented through her vanity and greed for objects out of her reach; her pride is the cause of her downfall which makes her go from a dissatisfied life to a true life of labour and manual suffering. From the very beginning of the text, Mathilde has been gluttonous and insatiable, always coveting to be \u201cpopular, envied, attractive, and in demand\u201d, believing that \u201cgod had made her for such things\u201d. Moreover, the lack of invaluable, substantial items doesn\u2019t seem to bother her husband who you could argue is the antithesis of Mathilde; he contradicts Mathilde\u2019s fanciful desires of \u201cexquisite dishes\u201d, whereas he thinks that \u201cthere\u2019s nothing [he] likes better than a nice stew\u201d. The exclamatory sentence \u201cAh! Splendid\u201d juxtaposes his wife\u2019s melodramatic views on their living conditions. Perhaps the way Mathilde is presented in a male dominated society as someone who is solely acquisitive, enticing and subservient, is quite stereotypical. However, it plays a vital role in the ironic and dramatic ending. When once she was described to be \u201cpretty\u201d and \u201cdelightful\u201d with moments that felt as if she were \u201cfloating in a cloud of happiness\u201d due to the \u201chomage, admiration, and desire she evoked\u201d, later, after a decade of arduous and taxing work trying to repay the debt of the lost necklace, she is said to \u201c[look] old\u201d as \u201cshe [has] turned into the battling, hard, uncouth housewife who rules working-class homes\u201d. The adjectives used to describe Mathilde are now vulgar and lacking refinement or elegance which, according to this text, makes her less feminine. Therefore, there is a certain irony to the story; her desire to be wealthy (which is derivative of her desire to be approved in society) is actually the very cause of her downfall. Considering this, I think that Maupassant effectively shows how a woman\u2019s views are shaped by the expectations and stereotypes of the patriarchal society she would\u2019ve lived in; her belief that she was worthy of more in life due to her physical attributes, despite her lack of material objects, show that women are expected to place their attractiveness to a man as their highest priority, but Maupassant demonstrates how this over fixation on their appeal can be the cause of their nadir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n<p>To conclude, these pieces of poetry and prose have all explored the female perspective in different ways: Maya Angelou focuses on realising the strength of muliebrity and rising above the oppression of this power; Kate Chopin highlights the ignorance men have of the desires women have for freedom and reveals the repressive nature of marriage for a woman; Guy de Maupassant portrays a divided social hierarchy in a patriarchal society and how a woman\u2019s attitude and perception of the world is affected by this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Exploring how the writers of \u201cStill I Rise\u201d, \u201cThe Necklace\u201d, and \u201cThe Story of an Hour\u201d present the female perspective. Feminist writers throughout the centuries have reminded us of the conventions and quintessential qualities that men have given us and have defied these stereotypes through poetry, novels, short stories and more. These pieces of literature [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":189,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"saved_in_kubio":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,15,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-186","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-coursework","category-literature","category-women"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordswomenmyths.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordswomenmyths.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordswomenmyths.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordswomenmyths.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordswomenmyths.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=186"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/wordswomenmyths.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":259,"href":"https:\/\/wordswomenmyths.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186\/revisions\/259"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordswomenmyths.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/189"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordswomenmyths.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=186"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordswomenmyths.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=186"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordswomenmyths.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=186"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}